Your best investor from the last round is often the one most likely to sit out the next one — and it’s rarely about you. Here’s the mechanic behind the “follow-on trap” and how to read it correctly.
It’s fund math, not a verdict on your company
Funds reserve capital for follow-ons when they make the initial investment, sized against a model of how many portfolio companies will need it and when. A fund that’s deployed its reserves faster than planned — often because other portfolio companies are doing well and pulling more capital — can be genuinely out of dry powder for your round specifically, independent of how they feel about you.
The signal that actually matters
Don’t read the decision — read the process around it. An investor who passes on pro-rata but spends an hour helping you think through the round, makes two warm intros, and asks good questions about your plan is telling you something different than one who goes quiet. The check size is one data point. Their behavior around the decision is a better one.
What to do about it
- Ask directly, early. “Are you planning to participate in this round?” three months before you need an answer beats finding out during the raise.
- Don’t let a pass become a public signal. If they’re willing, agree on how (or whether) their non-participation gets characterized to new investors — silence reads worse than a clear, boring explanation.
- Use the intro capital anyway. A fund that can’t write the check can often still open doors. Ask for that explicitly instead of writing them off.
Navigating investor dynamics mid-raise is exactly the kind of thing a second opinion helps with — work with us through the round.
Leave a Reply